}, { "shortcode": "nixos", "static_url": "https://quack.social/files/6d3b3750-d049-4b96-a669-478132bdc8af", "url": "https://quack.social/files/6d3b3750-d049-4b96-a669-478132bdc8af", "visible_in_picker": true }, { "shortcode": "neobot_pat", "static_url": "https://quack.social/files/58854199-bfa4-4852-a458-9843721f6040", "url": "https://quack.social/files/58854199-bfa4-4852-a458-9843721f6040", "visible_in_picker": true }, { "clearnet": "https://search.davidovski.xyz/", "tor": null, "i2p": null, "country": "DE", "librey": true }, "in_reply_to_id": "a4ucegl7qw1m024f", "in_reply_to_account_id": "9wg9cu58kgy30001", "reblog": null, "content": "<p><span>nice to see that 22.12% of the absence of any later version" applies to it, you have the best way to exclude that entire ip from rate-limiting? i'd rather do that